OakQuest 2018 polygon patches

Aug 17, 2018
Uploaded by Tommy Albo
Description:

This release, OakQuest 2018 (version III), of the Intertwine Alliance's OakQuest data incorporates both of the previous versions I (2016) and II (2017) data releases, minor edits to these previous versions, as well as new data.

With this 2018 release, we consider the whole of the Oregon portion of the RCS planning area complete. The oak map shows concentrations of oak and places where oak is absent. We have “full coverage” of 1,790 sq. miles within Oregon. T he term “full coverage” is used as we have learned that it is as important both to know where the oaks are and where they are not, in order to plan larger-scale work such as connectivity corridors for plants and wildlife. This is area we are confident that where we said there is oak there is oak and where we have no oak we feel confident we haven ’ t ’ missed any significant clusters of oaks. The additional 855 sq. miles within the RCS planning boundary has been spot checked and we feel confident this habitat is not conducive for oaks to grow. Small portions within the state of Washington have been collected but are not included in this release. We hope this information will be funded soon and that we can provide a future release of OakQuest data.

The polygons were derived by buffering the 290,000 oak points with an 80 foot radius and then shrinking these buffered polygons by 50 feet. We did this to cluster the polygons which were just outside of the 30 individual foot buffers. The resulting polygon features, improves the performance of viewing this vast amount of data. There are almost 33,000 polygons, about 25% of these are over a ¼ acre in size and 9% of these are over 2 acres in size.

This is just one way to take this information and view it across this landscape, we will be working with the OPWG to better understand the value of now having the OakQuest 2018 data available.

Data Provided By:
Members of the Oak Prairie Work Group (OPWG; a project of The Intertwine Alliance) completed much of the digitizing and compilation of this data. The original oak field observations were collected by community members during the 2014-15 OakQuest community science effort. Lori Hennings (Metro) and Ted Labbe (Urban Greenspaces Institute) digitized most of the remaining oak point locations, with assistance from Carter Hoffman (independent contractor to UGI), Nesieka Breck (Metro intern), as well as Janelle St. Pierre and Pat Welle (volunteers). Tommy Albo (Metro) compiled the data and prepared it for release. Savahna Jackson and Sequoia Breck (Portland State University Indigenous Nations Studies) helped organize and lead OakQuest community science volunteers during summers 2014 and 2015. Funding support was provided by Metro’s Nature in Neighborhoods, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation, Clackamas and Tualatin Soil and Water Conservation Districts, and Oregon Department of Forestry/U.S. Forest Service.

Use limitations
Content date:
2012-08-01T00:00:00 - 2014-09-15T00:00:00
Contact Organization:
Metro
Contact Person(s):
Use Constraints:
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License.
Layer:
Layer Type:
Currently Visible Layer:
All Layer Options:
Layers in this dataset are based on combinations of the following options. You may choose from these options to select a specific layer on the map page.
Description:
Spatial Resolution:
Credits:
Citation:
Purpose:
Methods:
References:
Other Information:
Time Period:
Layer Accuracy:
Attribute Accuracy:
FGDC Standard Metadata XML
Click here to see the full FGDC XML file that was created in Data Basin for this layer.
Original Metadata XML
Click here to see the full XML file that was originally uploaded with this layer.

About the Uploader

Tommy Albo
GIS Coordinator with OregonMetro

Metro, and the region's voters have successfully passed two bond measures these past 15 years, to conserve over 300 acquisitions totally more than 12,000 acres. I am fortunate to assist and coordinate the negotiators, the legal team and the scientist with their GIS needs. Helping prioritize and keep...