The Nature Conservancy (TNC) has derived climate suitability forecasts
for most species of trees and shrubs considered to be ecological
dominants of terrestrial Californian habitat types. Our plant
projections are compiled as decision support tools to help Conservancy
project staff, as well as our external partners, develop the necessary
plans, priorities and strategies to successfully adapt to uncertain
changes in future climate. In the recently completed Southern Sierra
Partnership's 2010 Climate-Adapted Conservation Plan for the Southern
Sierra Nevada and Tehachapi Mountains, species and habitat forecasts
shown here informed the development of a regional conservation design
that explicitly incorporates long-term conservation values based upon
potential climate adaptation threats and opportunities.
Maps of our species forecasts rely on colors to distinguish those areas
where climates appear to be suitable both today and in the future (i.e.
blue = 'climate refugia'), in contrast to those areas where suitable
climates are projected to be lost (i.e. red = 'climate stress'), or
gained in the future (i.e. purple = 'expansion zones'). For ensemble
forecasts, we treat all futures as equally likely, and use color
saturation to denote relative levels of uncertainty between future
projections, where dark colors imply > 80% model consensus (i.e. 'low
uncertainty'), and light colors imply > 60% model consensus (i.e.
'moderate uncertainty'). For scenario forecasts (i.e. 'hot & wet',
'warm & dry, 'hot & dry'), projections are based upon individual
climate models, and can be used collectively to bracket the potential
extremes of future climate changes. We caution that species
distributions are often limited by many factors other than climate, and
ultimately, the climate vulnerability of each species will depend upon
its exposure and sensitivity to climate impacts, as well as factors that
influence adaptation potential, such as species attributes (e.g.
dispersal ability, physiology, behavior, genetic diversity), landscape
attributes (e.g. topography, hydrology) and management context (e.g.
conservation status, habitat loss, fragmentation).
All species projections were derived in Maxent
(http://www.cs.princeton.edu/~schapire/maxent/) using default parameters
settings, plus removal of all duplicate records, and partitioning of
observation data into training data (70%) and testing data (30%) for
model validation. All species modeled had > 30 spatially unique
observation records. Observation data came from statewide rapid and
releve surveys, supplemented by specimens from the California Consortium
of Herbaria (http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/consortium/index.html). Modern
climate data (1961-1990) used in forecasts represents PRISM 800m layers
(http://www.prism.oregonstate.edu/). Future climate projections
(2045-2065) are based upon downscaled model run averages from 11 general
circulation models (GCMs) run under A2 emission scenarios by
International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) contributors
(http://www.ipcc-data.org/). To compare projections across futures, and
between species, continuous logistic model projections were converted
into binary grids (0 = unsuitable, 1 = suitable) using species-specific
thresholds (i.e. sensitivity = 0.95) derived from modern projections and
then applied uniformly to all modern and future projections. Statewide
projections were clipped to the spatial extent of the Southern Sierra
Partnership's project boundary. All layers are presented in geographic
(i.e. latitude, longitude) WGS 84.
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) uses the most current and complete data
available. GIS data and product accuracy may vary. Using GIS products
for purposes other than those for which they were intended may yield
inaccurate or misleading results. TNC reserves the right to correct,
update, modify, or replace GIS products without notification.