This dataset combines "key ecological values" within intact
forest landscapes in order to identify what can be called "key
ecological areas" that is, the most valuable areas from an
ecological perspective.
Although intact forest landscapes have intrinsic value in themselves,
identifying "key ecological values" within intact forest
landscapes is challenging due to the limited amount of information on
most remaining intact areas. It is also difficult to evaluate trade-offs
in various prioritization schemes, as value judgments are required and
values vary widely. In addition, the methodologies that have been
developed for identifying and prioritizing values may not yet be
sufficiently refined in order to receive widespread acceptance.
Because of these challenges, GFWC approached the identification of
"key ecological values" within intact forest landscapes using
select indicators as illustrative only.
We do not presume that this is the only, or the best, analytical
approach possible. More detailed data on some indicators internally held
by various governments and industrial sectors could provide a more
accurate analysis, regardless of the approach taken. However, many
indicators were not included in our map analysis simply because
broad-scale inventories are not yet available or have not yet been
undertaken. More consultation with Canadians is required in order to
identify, categorize and prioritize key ecological values.
We do not presume, either, that the geographic areas we present in this
section are the only areas that deserve enhanced attention. For example,
woodland caribou and grizzly bear ranges need enhanced attention as
these species are in decline in significant areas nationwide. Our
results are a very broad landscape-scale illustration of focal areas
that may warrant enhanced conservation and stewardship attention. But
the approach we take is not an exhaustive study on this topic.
GFWC selected and mapped, in 1-kilometre grid cells, 7 key ecological
values for all of Canada's intact forest landscapes: soil organic
carbon; net biome productivity; wetlands; lakes and rivers; potential
old-growth; species diversity (reptiles and amphibians, birds, mammals,
trees); and, key focal species (woodland caribou)