Relaxed SuperCREZ units

Feb 16, 2018 (Last modified Mar 29, 2018)
Uploaded by Stephanie Dashiell
Description:
This dataset show SuperCREZ where site suitability estimates were relaxed because the existing and commercial renewable energy projects in a subset of SuperCREZs exceeded the estimated potential under the more restrictive Environmental Exclusion levels. For example, no potential installed capacity of solar CSP remain in the Kramer Super CREZ under the Category 4 Exclusion Level, but 1150 GWh of solar CSP generation need to be sited in Kramer due to existing or commercial power plants that cannot be excluded from the portfolio. We chose to model the entire build-out (both existing and commercial, as well as generic) for two key reasons. First, the electricity costs estimated in the RPS calculator reflect the entire portfolio, not just the “net short” build-out. Impacts (land use efficiency, environmental impact score) modeled using the net short build-out would not correspond to the electricity costs. Second, because locations of existing and commercial projects could not be made publicly available, we could not exclude them from the site suitability models. As a result, modeling only the net short build-out (i.e., generic projects) could select sites where current existing and commercial projects may be located.

In order to model the entire build-out of an RPS Calculator portfolio, including existing or commercial projects, we relaxed the environmental exclusions only for those Super CREZs with insufficient modeled potential to meet its RPS Calculator specified generation requirements. Exclusions were relaxed to the category that would allow sufficient generation to be sited. For example, a total of eight Super CREZs under the Category 4 Exclusion Level needed to be relaxed to Category 3 and three needed to be relaxed to Category 2 Exclusion Levels, in order to model the Super CREZ-specific generation portfolio (Figure 3). We prevented any additional generation from being sited in Super CREZs where the environmentally constrained potential was less than the generation from existing and commercial projects within those Super CREZs (see section 2.2 for a description of how these environmentally constrained portfolios were generated). We excluded from the site selection process Super CREZs with minimal (1500 m).
Data Provided By:
The Nature Conservancy, Energy and Environmental Economics, Grace Wu
Content date:
not specified
Contact Organization:
not specified
Contact Person(s):
not specified
Use Constraints:
Creative Commons LicenseThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Layer:
Layer Type:
Currently Visible Layer:
All Layer Options:
Layers in this dataset are based on combinations of the following options. You may choose from these options to select a specific layer on the map page.
Description:
Spatial Resolution:
Credits:
Citation:
Purpose:
Methods:
References:
Other Information:
Time Period:
Layer Accuracy:
Attribute Accuracy:
FGDC Standard Metadata XML
Click here to see the full FGDC XML file that was created in Data Basin for this layer.
Original Metadata XML
Click here to see the full XML file that was originally uploaded with this layer.
This dataset is visible to everyone
Dataset Type:
Layer Package
Downloaded by 1 Member
Included in 1 Public Map , 1 Private Map
Included in 1 Public Gallery

About the Uploader

Stephanie Dashiell
Energy Associate Project Director with The Nature Conservancy

I work on issues related to conservation of biodiversity and renewable energy development in California.