These data were extracted from the CALVEG Existing Vegetation tiles,
using the
CWHR type, Mixed Chaparral (MCH).
These CALVEG Existing Vegetation tiles have been
crosswalked to other classification systems, including the California
Wildlife Habitat Relationship System (CWHR).
The CWHR habitat classification
scheme has been developed to support the CWHR System, a wildlife
information system and predictive model for California's
regularly-occurring birds, mammals, reptiles and amphibians. When first
published in 1988, the classification scheme had 53 habitats. These
habitats — except the non-vegetated Barren habitat — are described in
detail in the CWHR publication entitled:
A Guide to Wildlife Habitats of California, 1988
Edited by Kenneth E. Mayer and William F. Laudenslayer, Jr.
State of California, Resources Agency,
Department of Fish and Game
Sacramento, CA. 166 pp.
At present, there are 59 wildlife habitats in the CWHR System:
27
tree, 12 shrub, 6 herbaceous, 4 aquatic, 8 agricultural, 1 developed,
and 1 non-vegetated. Please note: The 59 habitats described below were
designed for use with a predictive model for terrestrial vertebrate
wildlife species. They do not represent a comprehensive classification
scheme for the conservation and mapping of California's terrestrial
vegetation or its marine and estuarine habitats.
Stages are
defined for virtually all habitats. A stage is a combination of size and
cover class for tree-dominated habitats, age and cover class for shrub
habitats, height and cover class for herb habitats, and depth and
substrate for aquatic habitats. A field sampling protocol is
well-established for determining stages in all vegetated habitats.
Special habitat elements are also defined. They include live and
decadent vegetation elements such as snags, physical elements such as
banks and burrows, aquatic elements, vegetative and animal diet elements
and human-made elements.
The predictive model for each species
has expert-applied suitability ratings for three life-requisites –
breeding, cover and feeding. For each species, each habitat stage is
rated as high, medium, low or unsuitable for each of these life
requirements. Each special habitat element is also assessed as
essential, secondarily essential, preferred or not rated for the
species.