The Middle Fork John
Day River (MFJDR) in eastern Oregon is an Intensively Monitored Watershed and
is part of habitat status and trend monitoring through the Columbia Habitat and
Monitoring Program (CHaMP). The Middle Fork John Day Watershed (MFJDW) supports
Chinook salmon and steelhead, and numerous river restoration projects have been
undertaken in the watershed to improve channel and riparian habitat.
The MFJDW was the
focus of a complete geomorphic assessment using the River Styles framework®.
The River Styles framework employs a hierarchical scheme of river assessment
that is “nested” on the scale of regional, watershed, river reach, geomorphic
unit, and habitat or hydraulic unit features. This approach also encompasses
the ecological setting at every scale of analysis. The River Styles framework
includes four stages that build one upon the next, and and culminate in what
can be used as a template for a strategic river management plan.
We present three
datasets representing Stages 1-3 of the River Styles framework as
watershed-scale maps in the context of of the NHD (version 1, cartographic)
streamline network.
The second of three datasets shows geomorphic condition corresponding to River Styles throughout the Middle Fork John Day Watershed defined for
ephemeral, intermittent and perennial streams. Geomorphic condition is a measure of deviation from the “natural
or expected state” of any given stream reach. The natural or healthy state
refers to the ability of a river to function as expected given its particular
valley setting. The geomorphic condition further records the effects of
limiting factors and pressures imposed by human land use. It is a key
ingredient for determining reach recovery potential (river styles Stage Three),
and eventually, the formation of strategic management plans. Geomorphic condition is also the measure of a
river’s capacity for adjustment, the potential to modify its channel shape,
instream geomorphic units, and floodplain. Separate reaches of the same river
style may display physical differences that are understood by comparing each
one to a “reference reach”, the most suitable (and often, the most pristine)
example found in the watershed.
.