On June 29th 2018 this model was projected to the pronghorn hunt zone boundaries for complete coverage.
These are statistical model outputs for the summer distribution of female pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), completed by Conservation Biology Institute using location data from Institute for Wildlife Studies. Predictions of relative habitat suitability were generated for northeastern California from a multi-scale MaxEnt (habitat suitability model for presence-only data; Version 3.3.3k, Phillips et. al. 2006) model.
This 90m resolution species distribution model was calibrated within a 25 km buffer of all occurrence points. Location data were provided by the Institute for Wildlife Studies from high accuracy gps collars on female pronghorn. Points were divided into winter and summer months and thinned to a minimum nearest neighbor distance of 2.5 km, and divided into model training (n=239) and testing (n=79) sets. Do to time and budget constraints the winter model was not completed.
The model included the following 15 environmental predictors in order of mean permutation importance:
Existing tree cover (2.5 km)
Density of Secondandary Roads (20 km)
Percent grassland type (20 km)
Patch density of juniper (20 km)
Slope (10 km)
Interspersion juxtaposition of Shrubland within the landscape (20km)
Distance to juniper
Average summer (April to Sept) precipitation
Patch density of grassland (10km)
Percent like adjacencies of juniper woodland (10km)
Interspersion juxtaposition of juniper woodland (20km)
Percent like adjacencies of shrubland (1km)
Distance to all roads
Distance to perennial waters
This model has a mean 10-fold cross-validated test AUC score of 0.8332 (standard deviation 0.032), mean 10% test omission of 0.1801, mean difference between training and testing AUC of 0.03661, and correctly classified 72.15% of the reserved test occurrences (n=79; using maximum training sensitivity and specificity threshold).
Both the logistic continuous probability surface and binary layer are available. The binary layer depicting predicted suitable habitat was derived using the maximum training sensitivity and specificity threshold (0.3797). Results are preliminary and have not yet been reviewed by expert biologists.