The areas depicted
in this shapefile were derived for an analysis of
potential conservation priority areas on Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
lands, and across three BLM planning areas in Alaska, namely the Bering
Sea/Western Interior, Central Yukon, and Eastern Interior planning
areas.
Steps used to derive these core areas are described below.
Due to data limitations for Alaska, certain input
datasets have been substituted; therefore, this analysis of certain BLM
lands
in Alaska has not been wholly subject to peer review commensurate with
the below-referenced study. For a detailed account of the general
methodology used, see the peer-reviewed article by Dickson et al. 2014.
Specifying the analysis extent
Ownership data were obtained from the AK state spatial
data management system (http://sdms.ak.blm.gov/sdms/).
Areas included in the analysis extent were located
outside of existing special designations, including national monuments,
wilderness areas, and wilderness study areas (WSAs). We excluded WSAs
because they are provisionally protected until their designation is
changed through legislative action by the U.S. Congress. We used land
management designations in the U.S. Protected Areas Database and a
geographic information system (GIS; ArcGIS v10.1, Esri, Redlands, CA) to
identify and remove the aforementioned lands from our analysis extent.
Because we were interested in identifying candidate areas that could
meet the criteria for the highest level of protection, i.e., wilderness
designation, we also required lands in the analysis extent to be
contiguous areas > 20.2 km2 (or 5,000 ac, by convention the minimum
size for wilderness designation in the U.S.) after removal of areas
otherwise occupied by roads, railroads, and electric power transmission
lines. We
used roads data obtained from the AK State Geo-spatial Data Clearing House (2006) to buffer (5 m per side) and remove all
linear road features from the analysis extent. Additionally, we removed
railroads and powerlines, also using a 5-m buffer. Contiguous areas <
20.2 km2 were removed from consideration in our analysis extent.
We
defined our analysis extent using readily available data on current
road networks. Nevertheless, our results likely reflect errors in these
data that would be difficult to quantify over extensive portions of AK, so we
urge data users to scrutinize areas we assumed to be ‘roadless.’ Users
should also be mindful of high value areas within BLMs jurisdiction
where errors of commission (i.e., the presence of a road is falsely
indicated by the roads data) could have resulted in these areas
being excluded from our analysis.
All results were derived within three BLM planning areas in Alaska, namely the Bering Sea/Western
Interior, Central Yukon, and Eastern Interior planning areas.
Full metadata can be viewed upon download in the file named 'metadata1_original.xml'
Dickson,
B.G., L.J. Zachmann, and C.M. Albano. 2014. Systematic identification
of potential conservation priority areas on roadless Bureau of Land
Management lands in the western United States. Biological Conservation,
178:117-127.