About
Over the past three decades, extensive
field studies have been conducted to characterize the composition and
distribution of plant communities in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley. These
studies have been carried out for various purposes under the auspices of
federal and state research programs or in conjunction with Corps of Engineers
project planning efforts. In the process, a wetland site classification
approach has evolved based on hydrology, soils, and geomorphic setting. The
research data and classification system have been recently used to create a set
of Potential Natural Vegetation (PNV) maps covering more than 26,000 square
miles within the region. The purpose of PNV maps is to help guide restoration
planning and prioritization. Because the hydrology of the landscape has been
permanently changed by major flood control projects, the PNV maps do not
represent the distribution of the original, pre-settlement vegetation. Rather,
they identify the natural communities that are appropriate to the modern
altered hydrologic conditions. The PNV maps are available for use in a
Geographic Information System, where a range of complex restoration scenarios
(such as the development of wildlife travel corridors or refuge areas) can be
explored efficiently, and alternatives can be compared in terms of costs and
ecological effectiveness.
PNV maps have been assembled for each
of 7 sub-basins in the Mississippi Alluvial Valley, providing coverage of all
of the region between the northern border of the Arkansas Delta and the Red
River in Louisiana. They were developed using
existing soils and geomorphology maps, hydrologic maps that generally reflect
flood frequency, and a variety of other spatial data that helped define the
distribution of the PNV communities in the modern landscape. The sources of these data sets varied among
the basins, and the mapping criteria were adjusted to compensate as necessary
in order to maintain consistency in the site classification, community
classification, and levels of detail across all basins. While these maps are
suitable for planning and landscape analysis purposes as presented here, they
should be considered critically when used in designing restoration projects and
users should be prepared to adjust community boundaries as dictated by
conditions observed in the field.
Each of the basin maps is accompanied
by a table indicating the typical site features and species composition that
should be restored in each community type.
The dominant species designated in the map legend are generalized over
the entire area and may include species that are less abundant in some basins
than in others. Therefore, persons using
these maps for restoration should consult the appropriate descriptions associated
with each basin in planning site preparation and species selection. It is particularly critical to recognize that
the communities identified on these maps must have appropriate topography and
drainage conditions restored prior to planting, especially where decades of
farming or land-leveling have significantly altered the natural drainage
patterns. Many lowland hardwood forests
are maintained as wetlands due to shallow ponding of water rather than
flooding, and while flooding cannot be restored in most instances, the pattern
of micro-relief and vernal pools that characterized those sites in the past can
be approximated, and must be if restoration of the mapped communities is to be
successful.
Note that these maps are not
appropriate for use to identify specific flood frequency zones – the hydrologic
data used are an amalgam of flood modeling, observed past flood conditions, and
the inferred influence of topography and infrastructure, and they reflect the
relative “wetness” of a site but not necessarily the occurrence of flood
events. Similarly, these maps do not
reflect the distribution of jurisdictional wetlands, as defined under the
provisions of the Clean Water Act. Only the appropriate Corps of Engineers
District Regulatory Office can make that determination. These maps are intended to provide
restoration guidance and serve as planning tools only.